Dealmaker Q&A

Posted on

Content available in English and Spanish (scroll down)

TTR Dealmaker Q&A with Gómez-Pinzón Partner Juan David Quintero

Gómez-Pinzón

Juan David Quintero

He is a partner of the Merger & Acquisitions and Corporate Law practices in Gómez-Pinzón. He has more than 14 years of experience and is licensed to practice law in Colombia and in the State of New York. His practice centers on domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, private equity, joint ventures, and corporate reorganizations. Juan David has also counseled international and local multinational companies in acquiring and selling publicly traded companies, and in different corporate restructurings via mergers, spin-offs, and transformation processes.

TTR: What are your main conclusions for the M&A market in 1Q23? What are the most relevant drivers for consolidating the M&A market in Latin America in the rest of the year?

In general terms, there has been a decrease in the number of transactions in the first quarter compared to the same period of time of the previous year (almost 50% according to the reports given by you). Colombia has not been oblivious to the region’s trend. In particular, we have seen a concern in clients prior to venturing to invest in certain sectors (for example, conventional energy, hydrocarbons and health), due to the legal reforms that the current Government is promoting, in tax, labor, pension and health. All of the above and the “shake downs” that we are currently seeing from the American, European and other economies in the region, may be an explanation for this downward trend in the first part of the year.

However, in the coming months we will see how the different Latin-American economies are reactivated; the market will continue to be attractive to international investors who, in a way, “support” more the political movements in the region; unlike local investors who would seem to be more averse to these sudden changes in local government policies.

TTR: In which sectors might international investors find the biggest opportunities in the Latin American transactional market? Why?

Without a doubt, investment in renewable energies (wind and photovoltaic) will be preponderant in the international and national investor appetite. We´ve seen it in Chile and Peru; Colombia is no stranger to this reality and the national government has been announcing its commitment to an energy transition that points to these new energy sources as an important focus in its government plan. The health sector, paradoxically, could also bring opportunities to investors. The health service is inelastic by nature, people will continue to get sick and require this service, regardless of the political overtones of the government on duty. Lastly, the technology sector will offer important opportunities to investors looking for businesses that are quickly adaptable to other jurisdictions, as well as synergies with more “traditional” businesses. Facing the decrease in the appetite for fixed assets and the spirit of business in which know-how is of the greatest preponderance will make this sector one of great importance for investors.

TTR: Continuing with the Venture Capital segment, we see that, after the boom of 2021, the emergence of unicorns is slowing down and some are disappearing. What is your evaluation for this industry in Latin America in 2023? Which countries could perform better in this segment?

We have seen how most of the so-called unicorns have lagged behind in a development stage and have not been able to consolidate their position in the market and in many cases, if not all, they have not been able to go public. There is greater skepticism that they may advance to consolidate the business and have had to go through rounds of financing and refinancing. Clearly, equity holders are looking for investments that have a lower risk profile than VC. The economic situation in the region, added to the situation in the United States, means that the flow of capital is not so constant and the risk profile of investors changes and, in a certain sense, they are averse to these investments. The countries that can best adapt regulation and different entry barriers to startups and emerging companies will be the ones that will attract these investors.

TTR: In terms of global prospects, how do you think what happened with Silicon Valley Bank will affect the world of Venture Capital in LatAm? What are the main lessons for the players in this market?

In general terms, we do not see a clear incidence relationship between with what happened with SVB and the VC market in Latin America. Unlike what happens in the United States, we have not seen a concentration of economic sectors and capital in Latin American countries. Undoubtedly, the SVB precedent is a lesson learned, not only for financial institutions but also for our clients and their businesses. The concentration of liquidity and capital in the same sector is a risky bet. Most of SVB’s long-term assets were in Treasury bonds and mortgage bonds and as interest rates rose, the value of these assets fell. In the Latin American market, the stock markets are not as deep and there is not such a marked concentration of capital. Clearly the SVB case study is as a lesson learned for clients, particularly on investment diversification. As we say in Colombia, “You don’t put all your eggs in one basket”

TTR: What will be Gómez-Pinzón’s main challenges in Colombia in the upcoming months?

Our work as lawyers for our clients will be to accompany them at all times and keep them informed about the reforms that are being carried out and those that will come; Continuously monitor changes that occur, and comprehensively analyze what implications they may have for our clients and their respective industries. The message we seek to convey is that moments of uncertainty will also offer attractive alternatives and those who know how to position themselves better will be able to take advantage of others.

Spanish version

Gómez-Pinzón

Juan David Quintero

Es socio de las prácticas de Fusiones & Adquisiciones y Derecho Corporativo de la firma Gómez-Pinzón, cuenta con más de 12 años de experiencia profesional y se encuentra admitido a la práctica del derecho en Colombia y en el estado de Nueva York. Su trayectoria se ha centrado en fusiones y adquisiciones locales y transfronterizas, así como en fondos de capital privado, joint ventures y reorganizaciones de grupos empresariales. Juan David ha asesorado a importantes empresas locales y multinacionales en la adquisición y venta de compañías privadas y listadas en bolsa, y en procesos de reorganización de estructura societaria mediante fusiones, escisiones y transformaciones.

TTR: ¿Cuáles son sus principales conclusiones para el mercado de M&A en el primer trimestre del año? ¿Cuáles son los drivers más relevantes para consolidar el mercado de M&A en América Latina en lo que resta del año?

En términos generales se ha evidenciado una disminución en el número de transacciones en el primer trimestre a comparación del mismo periodo del año anterior (casi un 50% de acuerdo con las cifras reportadas por ustedes mismos). Colombia, por supuesto, no ha sido ajeno a la tendencia de la región. En particular hemos visto una preocupación en clientes previo a aventurarse a invertir en determinados sectores (p.ej. energías convencionales, hidrocarburos y salud), con motivo de las reformas legales que se encuentra promoviendo el Gobierno actual, en materia tributaria, laboral, pensional y de salud. Esto sumado a los “coletazos” que vemos de la economía americana, europea y otras de la región, puede ser una explicación a esta tendencia a la baja en la primera parte del año. 

Ahora bien, en los meses venideros veremos cómo se reactivan las diferentes economías de Latinoamérica; el mercado seguirá siendo atractivo para los inversionistas internacionales que en cierta manera “soportan” más los movimientos políticos de la región; a diferencia de los inversionistas locales que parecerían ser más adversos a estos cambios repentinos en las políticas de los gobiernos locales.  

TTR: ¿En qué sectores los inversionistas internacionales podrían encontrar las mayores oportunidades en el mercado transaccional de América Latina? ¿Por qué?

Sin duda alguna la inversión en energías renovables (eólicas y fotovoltaicas) serán protagonistas en el apetito inversionista internacional y nacional. Lo hemos visto en las jurisdicciones de Chile y Perú; Colombia no es ajena a esta realidad y por parte del gobierno nacional han venido anunciando su apuesta por una transición energética que apunta a estas nuevas fuentes de energía como un foco importante en su plan de gobierno. El sector salud, paradójicamente, también podría traer oportunidades a los inversionistas. El servicio a la salud es inelástico de naturaleza, las personas nos seguiremos enfermando y consumiendo este servicio, sin importar el tinte polítrico del gobierno de turno. Por último, el sector de tecnología ofrecerá oportunidades importantes a inversionistas que busquen negocios de rápida adaptabilidad e internacionalización para otras jurisdicciones, al igual que sinergias con los negocios más “tradicionales”. Frente a la disminución de apetito por activos fijos (difícil traslado) y el ánimo por negocios en los cuales el know how resulta de la mayor preponderancia harán de este sector uno de muchísima importancia para los inversionistas.  

TTR: Continuando con el segmento de Venture Capital vemos que, después del ‘boom’ de 2021, el surgimiento de unicornios está disminuyendo y algunos están desapareciendo. ¿Qué evaluación tiene de esta industria en América Latina en 2023? ¿Cuáles países de la región podrían tener un mejor desempeño en este segmento?

Hemos visto como la mayoría de los llamados unicornios se han quedado rezagados en una etapa de desarrollo y no han logrado consolidar su posición en el mercado y en muchos casos, sino todos, no han podido salir a la bolsa. Existe un mayor escepticismo en que avancen a una consolidación del negocio y han tenido que pasar por rondas de financiación y refinanciación. Evidentemente los tenedores de capital están buscando inversiones que tengan un perfil de riesgo menor que el de VC. La coyuntura económica de la región sumada a la coyuntura de Estados Unidos, hacen que el flujo de capitales no sea tan constante y el perfil de riesgo de los inversionistas cambie y en cierto sentido sean aversos a estas inversiones. Los países que mejor puedan adaptar la regulación y diferentes barreras de entrada a los startups y empresas emergentes serán los que lograrán atraer a estos inversionistas. 

TTR: En términos de perspectivas globales, ¿cómo cree que lo que sucedido con Silicon Valley Bank pueda afectar al mundo del Venture Capital en la región? ¿Cuáles son las principales lecciones para los jugadores en este mercado? 

En términos generales no vemos una clara relación de incidencia entre lo que pasó con SVB y el mercado de VC en Latinoamérica. A diferencia de lo que ocurre en Estados Unidos, no hemos visto una concentración de sectores económicos y de capital en los países de Latinoamérica. Sin duda, el precedente de SVB es una lección aprendida, no solo para entidades financieras sino para nuestros clientes y sus negocios. La concentración de liquidez y capitales en un mismo sector es una apuesta arriesgada. La mayoría de los activos a largo plazo de SVB se encontraban en bonos del Tesoro y bonos hipotecarios y a medida que las tasas de interés aumentaban, el valor de estos activos disminuía. En el mercado latinoamericano los mercados de valores no son tan profundos y no existe una concentración de capital tan marcada. Claramente el caso de estudio de SVB sirve de base como una lección aprendida para los clientes, en particular sobre la diversificación en las inversiones. Como decimos en Colombia, “No hay que colocar todos los huevos en una misma canasta” 

TTR: ¿Cuáles serán los principales desafíos de Gómez-Pinzón en Colombia en los próximos meses?

Nuestra labor como abogados frente a los clientes será la de acompañarlos en todo momento y mantenerlos informados sobre las reformas que se adelantan y las que vendrán; hacer seguimiento continuo sobre los cambios que se presenten, y analizar de manera integral qué implicaciones pueden tener para nuestros clientes y sus respectivas industrias. El mensaje que buscamos transmitir es que los momentos de incertidumbre ofrecerán también alternativas atractivas y quienes sepan posicionarse mejor, podrán tomar ventaja frente a los demás. 

Dealmaker Q&A

Posted on

Content available in English

TTR Dealmaker Q&A with AON Head of M&A in LatAm Felipe Junqueira

AON

Felipe Junqueira

Felipe is our M&A and Transaction Solutions Leader in Latin America. He holds degrees in law, accounting and business administration and has a post-graduate degree in project management from Ibmec Business School. He has extensive experience and comprehensive knowledge in the M&A and Private Equity arenas, covering activities in the financial and legal areas with a background in advisory and consultancy work focused on mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance, and experience in accounting, financial, risk and insurance due diligence for transactions.
He has experience in the oil and gas industry, logistics, infrastructure and retail, among other sectors. 

TTR: What are your main conclusions for the M&A market in 1Q23? What are the most relevant drivers for consolidating the M&A market in Latin America in the rest of the year?

The M&A market started at a slow pace in 2023 as a reflection of global phenomena such as the increase in interest rates, inflation, the global political crisis (with emphasis on the war in Ukraine) and more regional phenomena such as the low level of economic growth in some countries and recent political changes. We understand that throughout the year, as global phenomena unfold towards stabilization and more regional issues with emphasis on the change of governments in some countries (as governments give clearer signals to investors), the level of investments tends to be resumed.

TTR: In which sectors might international investors find the biggest opportunities in the Latin American transactional market? Why?

Technology continues to be one of the main sectors, but we have seen great potential for the resumption of large infrastructure transactions, with emphasis on Power.

TTR: Continuing with the Venture Capital segment, we see that, after the boom of 2021, the emergence of unicorns is slowing down and some are disappearing. What is your evaluation for this industry in Latin America in 2023? Which countries could perform better in this segment?

The Venture Capital sector, as it is quite daring and dependent on investments, has suffered to some extent with uncertainties and the change in paradigms in the circulation and destination of capital in recent times. We have seen an interesting movement in the Caribbean and in some countries in the region with increasing investments in start-up ecosystem development centers that we understand still have a very large growth potential.

TTR: In terms of global prospects, how do you think what happened with Silicon Valley Bank will affect the world of Venture Capital in LatAm? What are the main lessons for the players in this market?

It is common knowledge that a mismatch between assets and liabilities drove Silicon Valley Bank’s equity to almost zero, leading to its failure. The bank’s delicate situation, together with other recent events in the global banking market, has caused some volatility in the credit market. While this does not necessarily mean systemic risk, there is a tendency towards relative conservatism and impact on banks’ willingness to lend and take risks which may boost the equity market (and therefore the VC market) even if it depends on other matters that need to occur since the Equity Capital Market tend to compete with atypical higher returns from the Debt market.

TTR: What will be Aon’s main challenges in countries like Colombia, Mexico, Brazil and Chile in the upcoming months?

We saw that the number of transactions was relatively stable in Mexico and Colombia in 2022 (compared to the previous year) but, on the other hand, Chile shows to have been the country that performed best in the first Quarter. Regarding Brazil, which has undergone a very recent change from a political point of view, we expect a gradual recovery. In any case, we noticed that the transactions ticket had a considerable reduction at a general level, and we expect that this paradigm changes throughout the year.

TTR: As a leading global professional services firm in M&A and Transactions, what advice would you give to the M&A players in Latin America considering the market moment and your expertise?

Due to the current market uncertainties, a more detailed and assertive mapping of opportunities combined with a broader analysis effort over the target businesses and the search for alternative negotiation tools can be considered fundamental for the success of the transactions and the resumption of the pace of the market. From a due diligence standpoint, considering the assessment of topics such as risks, insurance, people and intellectual property has proven to be key to avoiding future surprises that could together erode part of the value of the Deal. Added to this, knowing the insurance tools for transferring risks that often get stuck at the negotiation table can be another key factor. In recent times, there have been several opportunities in which we spoke to our clients and prospects and heard that if they knew in the past insurance such as Reps & Warranties (or Warranties & Indemnities) for unknow risks, Tax insurance, Litigation insurance, or even surety bonds (like the Escrow Bond) some negotiations that were not successful would probably have been completed. In summary, information and the right tools here is essential and our focus is to help our clients to better understand the business and transfer risks to make better decisions.

Dealmaker Q&A

Posted on

Content available in English and Spanish (scroll down)

TTR Dealmaker Q&A with Seale & Associates Managing Director  Sergio García del Bosque

Seale & Associates México

Sergio García del Bosque

He is a managing director with significant experience in mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, arrangement of financing, general financial advisory, valuation and strategy consulting. Mr. Garcia del Bosque joined Seale & Associates in 2008 and has acted as lead advisor to numerous public and private companies on international and domestic transactions. Representative corporate clients include CEMEX, FEMSA,  Tyco, United Technologies, among other. Mr. Garcia del Bosque has also advised the shareholders and management of many founder-owned, family-owned and other private organizations and helped them achieve their strategic objectives through transactions, strategic alternatives assessments and generational planning. Representative privately owned clients include Caffenio, Cosmocel, Cuprum, Grupo Tampico, INMAGUSA, Torrey, among other. Mr. Garcia del Bosque leads the Mexico City office of Seale & Associates since 2016.

TTR: What are your main conclusions for the M&A market in 1Q23? What are the most relevant drivers for consolidating the M&A market in Mexico in the rest of the year?

The M&A market in Mexico remains strong despite the global economic headwinds such as high interest rates and inflation, as well as geopolitical tensions in different parts of the world. Global companies and private equity groups are showing renewed interest in investing in Mexico due to the potential for nearshoring operations to serve the North American market, as well as the opportunity to tap into the large and growing Mexican domestic market. Based on the current level of activity and inquiries for new projects, we expect the Mexican M&A market to remain robust for the rest of the year.

TTR: In which sectors might international investors find the biggest opportunities in the Mexican transactional market? Why?

International investors may find the biggest opportunities in sectors such as agriculture & livestock, IT services, and manufacturing. Mexican companies in these sectors can offer competitive prices and quick time response for delivering products and services to the North American market. Other sectors that are also attractive to global companies include building products, consumer products, and healthcare, which continue to grow as the Mexican population and economy expand.

TTR: Continuing with the Venture Capital segment, we see that, after the boom of 2021, the emergence of unicorns is slowing down and some are disappearing. What is your evaluation for this industry in Mexico in 2023?

In 2023, there is still significant interest from Venture Capital to invest in Mexico, but valuations and risk tolerance have decreased compared to 2021. Funds in this space are becoming more selective about their investments. We expect that some companies may not be able to secure additional rounds of investment and will need to explore strategic alternatives such as mergers, partnerships, or divestitures. However, there are still significant opportunities in fintech and e-commerce, and companies in these industries will continue to be funded despite the current headwinds.

TTR: In terms of global prospects, how do you think what happened with Silicon Valley Bank will affect the world of Venture Capital in the region? What are the main lessons for the players in this market?

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank will affect many startups across the world, including those in Mexico, as there are no other specialized banks that can provide the same tailored services. One lesson for startups is to consider that higher returns and benefits always come with more risk.

TTR: What will be Seale & Associates’ main challenges in the upcoming months?

Seale & Associates’ main challenges will be to select the best projects and clients, as some companies may lack a well-defined strategy or strong commitment from management and boards to do acquisitions in the region. The firm will also continue to focus on developing the M&A market in Mexico by educating companies about M&A matters across the region. Additionally, headcount growth will be a priority for Seale & Associates, and the firm will implement a new training program with collaboration from top advisors in the M&A ecosystem to develop talent faster and have relationships with all the players in the industry early on.

Spanish version

Seale & Associates México

Sergio García del Bosque

Es director ejecutivo con una importante experiencia en fusiones, adquisiciones, desinversiones, arreglos de financiación, asesoramiento financiero general, valoración y consultoría estratégica.
Se unió a Seale & Associates en 2008 y ha actuado como asesor principal de numerosas empresas públicas y privadas en transacciones internacionales y nacionales. Entre los clientes corporativos representativos se encuentran CEMEX, FEMSA, Tyco, United Technologies, entre otros.
Ha asesorado a los accionistas y a la administración de muchas organizaciones de propiedad de los fundadores, de propiedad familiar y otras organizaciones privadas y les ha ayudado a alcanzar sus objetivos estratégicos a través de transacciones, evaluaciones de alternativas estratégicas y planeación generacional. Entre los clientes privados representativos se encuentran Caffenio, Cosmocel, Cuprum, Grupo Tampico, INMAGUSA, Torrey, entre otros. Sergio Garcia del Bosque dirige la oficina de Seale & Asociados en la Ciudad de México desde 2016.

.

TTR: ¿Cuáles son sus principales conclusiones para el mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en el primer trimestre de 2023? ¿Cuáles son los impulsores más relevantes para consolidar el mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en México durante el resto del año?

El mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en México sigue siendo fuerte a pesar de los obstáculos económicos globales, como las altas tasas de interés y la inflación, así como las tensiones geopolíticas en diferentes partes del mundo. Las empresas globales y los grupos de capital privado están mostrando un renovado interés en invertir en México debido al potencial de operaciones de nearshoring para servir al mercado norteamericano, así como a la oportunidad de incursionar en el mercado interno mexicano, que es grande y está en constante crecimiento. Basados en el nivel actual de actividad e indagaciones de nuevos proyectos, esperamos que el mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en México se mantenga sólido durante el resto del año.

TTR: ¿En qué sectores pueden los inversores internacionales encontrar las mayores oportunidades en el mercado transaccional mexicano? ¿Por qué?

Los inversores internacionales pueden encontrar las mayores oportunidades en sectores como la agricultura y la ganadería, los servicios de TI y la manufactura. Las empresas mexicanas en estos sectores pueden ofrecer precios competitivos y una rápida respuesta para entregar productos y servicios al mercado norteamericano. Otros sectores que también son atractivos para las empresas globales incluyen productos de construcción, productos de consumo y cuidado de la salud, los cuales continúan creciendo a medida que la población y la economía mexicanas se expanden.

Continuando con el segmento de capital de riesgo, vemos que, después del boom de 2021, la aparición de unicornios se está desacelerando y algunos están desapareciendo.

TTR: ¿Cuál es su evaluación para esta industria en México en 2023?

En 2023, todavía hay un interés significativo por parte del venture capital para invertir en México, pero las valoraciones y la tolerancia al riesgo han disminuido en comparación con 2021. Los fondos en este espacio están siendo más selectivos en cuanto a sus inversiones. Esperamos que algunas empresas no puedan asegurar rondas adicionales de inversión y necesiten explorar alternativas estratégicas, como fusiones, alianzas o desinversiones. Sin embargo, todavía existen oportunidades significativas en fintech y comercio electrónico, y las empresas en estas industrias seguirán siendo financiadas a pesar de los obstáculos actuales.

TTR: ¿Cómo cree que afectará lo sucedido con Silicon Valley Bank al mundo del capital de riesgo en la región? ¿Cuáles son las principales lecciones para los actores de este mercado?

El colapso de Silicon Valley Bank afectará a muchas startups en todo el mundo, incluyendo aquellas en México, ya que no hay otros bancos especializados que puedan proporcionar los mismos servicios personalizados. Una lección para las startups es considerar que mayores rendimientos y beneficios siempre conllevan más riesgos.

TTR: ¿Cuáles serán los principales desafíos de Seale & Associates en los próximos meses?

Los principales desafíos de Seale & Associates serán seleccionar los mejores proyectos y clientes, ya que algunas empresas pueden carecer de una estrategia bien definida o de un fuerte compromiso por parte de la dirección y los consejos para llevar a cabo adquisiciones en la región. La firma también seguirá enfocándose en desarrollar el mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en México, educando a las empresas sobre los temas de M&A en toda la región. Además, el crecimiento de la plantilla será una prioridad para Seale & Associates, y la firma implementará un nuevo programa de capacitación en colaboración con los principales asesores del ecosistema de M&A para desarrollar el talento más rápido y establecer relaciones con todos los actores de la industria desde el principio.

Dealmaker Q&A

Posted on

Content available in English and Portuguese (scroll down)

TTR Dealmaker Q&A with MCM Corporate – Diligence and Projects Founder Marcela Huertas

MCM Corporate – Diligence and Projects

Marcela Huertas

· 8+ years leading Due Diligence Projects for investments in innovation and technology (seed, early, and series A stages) for Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital and Venture Debt holdings and Startups.
· Faculty member of the Trevisan Escola de Negócios (Trevisan Business School) M&A and Equity MBA Program.
· 17-year career in Audit and Consulting Companies, including the Big Four, in the merging, acquisition, and taxes fields.
· Member of ABVCAP’s Venture Capital Committee.
· Scrum Alliance Certified Product Owner. Extension Program in Financial and Tax Planning from PUC/SP. Graduate in Tax Law from the Brazilian Institute of Tax Studies – IBET. Bachelor of Law.

TTR: What are your main conclusions for the M&A market in 1Q23? What are the most relevant drivers for consolidating the M&A market in Brazil in the rest of the year?

The TTR data shows an expressive decrease in M&A operations compared to the same period in 2022. Venture Capital decreased by 50% in the number of transactions. On the other hand, Corporate Venture Capital, in global terms, had a slight decrease in deals; we can observe the rise of CVC. 

At MCM Corporate, we only work with diligent and realistic Venture Capital Holdings, Corporate Venture Capital, and Startups; our target client is not adventurous. Therefore, I notice that the overexcitement of the adventurer market does not undermine what was already in the pipeline of our more realistic clients that have credibility and, as a consequence, are well capitalized. I say that because we performed a higher number of diligences than we are used to for this period of the year, and that is because our clients have a more cautious profile and also because we operate with Corporate Venture Capital, I don’t think that there’s a lack of capital for good entrepreneurs.

I believe this is a trend for the Brazilian Market: more diligent entrepreneurs, managers, and companies that innovate more and more through M&A operations with startups and constituting their CVCs – a crucial factor for the consolidation of the M&A market in Brazil. Now it is time for the real deal:  the only ones to remain will be the sensible and diligent managers, entrepreneurs, and companies who know how to deal and collaborate seriously with the ecosystem. We are indeed maturing.

TTR: In which sectors might international investors find the biggest opportunities in Brazil? Why?

Agribusiness is the flagship sector in Brazil — it has always anchored us in moments of crisis. However, agribusiness has been undergoing a substantial transformation: we no longer speak only about commodities; we now provide an added value, which is technology. A moment of crisis for the big techs is also a moment of great opportunities for the Agtechs. After the massive layoff of qualified personnel from the big techs, the Agtechs have been absorbing a great deal of this qualified labor, and improving agribusiness-related technology. 

We have very competent managers focused on agribusiness here in Brazil. And at MCM Corporate, we have the privilege of working with one of LATAN’s main Agtech Holdings and seeing first-hand how agribusiness is not easily undermined by crises. It is a large market, the sector’s investment and operations are each day more technological, and I do not see any overexcitement in this sector: it is constantly working with real needs, real numbers, and real clients. Agtech is a success, and investors should look at the works of SP Ventures here in Brazil, which is a reference for investments in agribusiness. We can see this feat in the vertical of seed and early stages investments report of the TTR.

Second, I would highlight the relevance of HealthTechs. In 2022, we performed diligence in the health sector, and in 2023 we also started with HealthTechs. I can see many well-prepared entrepreneurs in this sector coming up with solutions for real health problems in Brazil, and making clever use of data. Vox Capital is yet another Manager that is worth the attention of investors operating here in Brazil as they are carrying out diligent work in the health area

TTR: MCM Corporate has been one of the leading advisors in Seed Early and Series A Venture Capital investments in Brazil. What are the prospects for this segment in the medium and long term?

The prospects for this segment are to continue growing and maturing. These are stages that demand a lot from Venture and Corporate Capital Holdings, but as I have already highlighted, we work with excellent early stage Holdings that, indeed, offer smart money. I always point out the importance of having competent and well-oriented Holdings, once this is a significant differential for the smart money — uninterested holdings have little to offer the entrepreneur. Since I started in this sector in 2015, I have noticed the growth of holdings, and their recurrence in 2nd or 3rd funds, besides the participation of the Venture Debt that does not dilute the share participation and contributes a lot to the next raising and the company’s strategy. It is also an instrument that also works as smart money, and not less importantly, I see the growth of Corporate Venture Capital in which big companies are also investing in these stages, or looking for experienced managers to manage your Corporate Venture Capital. It is a complex stage, but it is paramount for strengthening the ecosystem and improving governance. In the medium and long term, we will have even more experienced holdings and entrepreneurs who understand the role of smart money. I also see that there is a slight confusion among entrepreneurs in terms of differentiating smart money and traditional financial institutions. Those who understand this difference more quickly and prepare themselves, start ahead and have more quality relationships with risk capital holdings. 

TTR: Continuing with the Venture Capital segment, we see that, after the boom of 2021, the emergence of unicorns is slowing down and some are disappearing. What is your evaluation for this industry in Brazil in 2023? 

I believe that we are now in an actually normal course of operations. What happened in 2021 was unusual and unhealthy – no ecosystem is sustainable with unreal valuations, growth at any costs, hirings without any criteria, etc. In sum, it was all completely disconnected from reality. Now, we will continue growing, but in a much more realistic and responsible way, accessing other options of financial instruments, such as Venture Debt. Here at MCM Corporate, we have already worked with solid operations of 5 unicorn promises, and it is clear for us the kinds of operations and entrepreneurs that have the potential to get there. However, getting there is not for everyone – we need to stop romanticizing entrepreneurship and better use our reason and cash flow to work on solutions to real problems, in real markets, and with real numbers. Not all operations have the conditions and the market to become unicorns, and I don’t see that as a problem. It’s pure vanity of some adventurous entrepreneurs and capitalist holding – I prefer the reality!

TTR: In terms of global prospects, how do you think what happened with Silicon Valley Bank will affect the world of Venture Capital? What are the main lessons for the players in this market? 

That will require what should have always existed: consistency of operations, focus on problem-solving, cash management of the entrepreneurs, and more diligence from the Holdings. On the other hand, it will also require better governance and compliance from the financial institutions – it seems that we are living in an era of blindness in terms of risks. Let’s wait for the report that FED will present on May 1st and understand possible failures in risk management.

TTR: What will be MCM Corporate’s main challenges in Brazil in the upcoming months?

The lack of accounting, financial, and tax knowledge for the new economy is a big problem for our entrepreneur ecosystem; distorted information, while intentional or not, gets in the way of capitalist Holdings when separating good from bad businesses. Therefore, educating the market about these matters, so that we have more transparent and consistent businesses that are ready to get investments, is a big challenge. MCM is here to help educate entrepreneurs and accountants to provide honest and realistic information through our diligence and throughout Corporate Education. I teach MBA in programs of M&A and Equity, and I always tell my students that we need to elevate the level of our technical discussions so that we can create a transparent and trustworthy ecosystem – in a way that the new digital economy continues to solidly and diligently work and grow through M&A, Equity, and Debt.   

Portuguese version

MCM Corporate – Diligence and Projects

Marcela Huertas

· Há 8 liderando projetos de Due Diligence para Investimentos em Inovação e Tecnologia (estágios seed, early e serie A) para gestoras de Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital, Venture Debt e Startups.
· Docente no curso MBA em M&A e Equity da Trevisan Escola de Negócios.
· Carreira de 17 anos construída em Empresas de Auditoria e Consultoria, incluindo Big Four nas área de Fusões, Aquisições e Tributos. 
· Membro do Comitê de Venture Capital da ABVCAP.
· Certificada Product Owner pela Scrum Alliance. Extensão em Planejamento Financeiro e Tributário pela PUC/SP. Pós Graduada em Direito Tributário pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos Tributário – IBET. Graduada em Direito.

TTR: Quais são suas principais conclusões para o mercado de M&A no primeiro trimestre de 2023?, Quais são os fatores mais relevantes para a consolidação do mercado de M&A no Brasil no resto do ano?

Os dados do próprio TTR apontam uma queda expressiva das operações de M&A comparados ao mesmo período em 2022. Venture Capital  teve uma queda de mais de 50% no número de transações. Em contrapartida, o Corporate Venture Capital em termos globais teve uma queda pequena de deals,  podemos observar a crescente do CVC . 

Aqui na MCM Corporate só atuamos com perfil de Gestoras de Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital e Startups diligentes e realistas, não atendemos aventureiros, então percebo que a euforia do mercado aventureiro não fez abalar o que já estava no pipeline dos nossos Clientes que são mais realistas e tem credibilidade portanto estão capitalizados. Digo isso pois realizamos um volume maior de diligências do que estamos acostumados para esse período, e isso se deve ao fato dos nossos Clientes terem um perfil mais cuidadoso e também atuarmos com o Corporate Venture Capital, não acho que falta capital para bons empreendedores.  

Acredito que essa é uma tendência para o mercado brasileiro, empreendedores, gestores mais diligentes e empresas estão inovando cada vez mais, por meio de operações de M&A com startups e constituindo seus CVC´s, que são fatores muito importantes para a consolidação do mercado de M&A no Brasil, agora chegou a hora da verdade,  só ficarão gestores e empreendedores conscientes e diligentes e Empresas que saibam lidar e colaborar para o ecossistema com seriedade, estamos amadurecendo. 

TTR: Em quais setores os investidores internacionais podem encontrar as maiores oportunidades no Brasil? Por quê?

O agro é o carro chefe no Brasil, sempre nos ancora em momentos de crises, mas o agro tem se transformado, não falamos mais apenas em commodities, temos um valor agregado que é a tecnologia, um momento de crise nas big techs também é de grandes oportunidades para as agtechs, com as demissões de profissionais qualificados das big techs, as agtechs estão absorvendo boa parte dessa mão de obra qualificada e aprimorado as tecnologias voltadas para o agro. 

Temos Gestores bastante competentes focados no agro aqui no Brasil, e nós da MCM Corporate temos o privilégio de atender uma das principais Gestoras de agtech LATAM e vemos de perto o quanto o agro não se abala tanto com as crises, o mercado é grande, os investimentos e as operações voltadas para o setor estão cada vez mais tecnologicas e nao vejo euforia nesse setor, estão sempre trabalhando com necessidades reais, numeros reais, Clientes reais. As agtechs são um sucesso e os Investidores devem olhar para os trabalhos da SP Ventures que é uma referência de investimentos no agro aqui no Brasil. Podemos observar esse feito no relatório da vertical de investimentos seed e early stage do TTR .

Em segundo lugar destacaria a relevância das healthtechs. No ano de 2022 atendemos diligências no setor de saúde e 2023 também iniciamos com healthtechs. Vejo empreendedores muito bem preparados nesse setor, solucionando problemas reais da saúde no Brasil e fazendo uso muito inteligente de dados, a Vox Capital mais uma Gestora que vale a pena investidores observarem a atuação aqui no Brasil pois estão desempenhando um trabalho diligente na área da saúde.

TTR: MCM Corporate é um dos principais assessores em Investimentos de Venture Capital Seed, Early e Series A no Brasil. Quais são as perspectivas desse segmento no médio e longo prazo?

Continuar crescendo e amadurecendo, são estágios que exigem muito das Gestoras de Venture e Corporate Capital, mas como já destaquei atendemos excelentes Gestores Early stage que de fato oferecem o smart money. Saliento sempre a importância de se ter gestoras competentes e bem orientadas, pois isso é um grande diferencial para o smart money Gestoras desinteressadas pouco ajudam o empreendedor. Desde que comecei em 2015 nesse setor percebo o aumento de Gestores, sua recorrências em 2º ou 3º fundos, além da participação do Venture Debt que não dilui a participação societaria e contribui enormemente até a proxima captação e para estratégia da Empresa , é um instrumento que também cumpre seu papel como smart money e não menos importante vejo o crescimento do Corporate Venture Capital onde grandes Empresas também estão investindo nesses estágios ou buscanco Gestoras experientes para gerenciarem seu Corporate Venture Capital, é um estágio complexo mas extremamente importante para o fortalecimento do ecossistema e aprimoramento da governança, são os primeiros passos para transaparência e relação com investidores. No médio e longo prazo   teremos Gestoras ainda mais experientes e empreendedores entendendo o papel do smart money, ainda percebo uma certa confusão por parte dos Emprendedores em diferenciar smart money de instituições financeiras tradicionais, quem entende rápido essa diferença e se prepara sai na frente e tem relações de qualidade com Gestores de Capital de risco.

TTR: Continuando com o segmento de Venture Capital vemos que, após o ‘boom’ de 2021, o surgimento de unicórnios está diminuindo e alguns estão desaparecendo. Como você avalia essa indústria no Brasil em 2023?

Acredito que agora sim estamos no curso normal das operações, o que aconteceu em 2021 é algo fora da curva que não era saudável, nenhum ecossistema se  sustenta com valuations fora da realidade, crescimento a qualquer custo, constratações sem critérios tudo muito fora da realidade. Agora vamos continuar crescendo mas de forma mais consciente e realista e acessando outros tipos de instrumentos financeiros, como o Venture Debt, por exemplo. Aqui na MCM Corporate já atendemos operações sólidas de 5 promessas de unicórnios e podemos perceber operações e empreendedores que tem potencial para chegar lá, mas não é para todos essa chegada, precisamos parar de romantizar o empreendedorismo e utillizar mais a razão e o fluxo de caixa para trabalhar soluções de problemas reais em mercados reais com numeros também reais, nem todas as operações tem condições e mercado para virar unicórnio e não vejo problema nenhum nisso, é pura vaidade de alguns Empreendedores e Gestores Capitalistas aventureiros, prefiro a realidade!

TTR: Em termos de perspectivas globais, como você acha que o ocorrido com o Silicon Valley Bank afetará o mundo do Venture Capital? Quais são as principais lições para os players desse mercado?

Exigirá o que sempre deveria ter existido, consistência das operações, foco na solução de problemas, geração de caixa e não por parte dos Empreendedores e maior diligência por parte das Gestoras e por outro lado, maior governança e compliance por parte das Instituições Financeiras, parece que estamos vivendo uma era de uma cegueira em termos de riscos. Vamos aguardar o relatório que o FED apresentará em 1º de maio e entendermos eventuais falhas na gestão de riscos.

TTR: Quais serão os principais desafios para a MCM Corporate no Brasil nos próximos meses?

A falta de conhecimento sobre contabilidade, finanças e tributos para a nova economia é um grande problema para o nosso ecossistema empreendedor, informações distorcidas intencionalmente ou não atrapalham Gestores Capitalistas de separarem os bons dos maus negócios, então  educar o mercado sobre esses temas para termos negócios mais transparentes e consistentes para receberem investimentos é um grande desafio e a MCM está aqui para ajudar a educar empreendedores, contadores para demonstrarem informações verdadeiras e realistas por meio das nossas diligências e por meio da Educação Corporativa, ministro aulas em MBA nos cursos de M&A e Equity e sempre oriento meus alunos que precisamos elevar o nível das discussões técnicas para que possamos criar um ecossistema transparente e confiável para que a Nova Economia Digital continue cumprindo seu papel e crescendo por meio de M&A, Equity e Debt de forma sólida e diligente.   

Dealmaker Q&A

Posted on

Content available in English and Spanish (scroll down)

TTR Dealmaker Q&A with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer España Partner Armando Albarrán

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer España

Armando Albarrán

He heads the Global Transactions team (which covers Corporate/M&A, Capital Markets, Finance and Real Estate) in Spain.  A partner since 2004, Armando specialises in large and complex transactions with a cross-border element, including: (i) MásMóvil JV with Orange (€19.6bn); (ii) Siemens Energy’s takeover bid for Siemens Gamesa (€4bn); (iii) KKR’s acquisition of IVI-RMA Group (€3bn) and its combination with GeneraLife Group (€3.6bn); or (iv) Merlin Properties’ sale of Tree Inversiones Inmobiliarias to BBVA (€2bn), all of them the largest announced transactions per sector in Spain in 2022.  Armando heads TTR’s ranking of ‘Top 10 M&A lawyers in Spain, in 2022’ with a total value of deals accredited of €27.6bn, which is €8bn above the second ranked. He has also represented issuers and underwriters in a huge number of IPOs.  He is also active in debt capital markets representing clients such as Naturgy, Repsol, MERLIN and Amadeus.  Armando has a degree in law, economics and business administration from ICADE – E-3.

TTR: Freshfields is the undisputed leader for M&A in 2022, as shown by its high market share and leading position advising on the largest, most complex and most sophisticated transactions announced in Spain last year. What will Freshfields’ main challenges and opportunities be in terms of M&A in the upcoming months?

2022 was a historic year for our Madrid office. As always, our aim for 2023 is to remain close to our clients and accompany them through their transactions. The political, economic and regulatory uncertainties they currently face lend ever greater importance to high level legal services and practical experience on the ground.  In this uncertain environment we believe the consistency and quality across our Freshfields network of offices (the leading European network in terms of both quality and coverage of the main business markets, and one of the leading networks at the global level) together constitute a great opportunity for us. Our main challenge for 2023 is to maintain that leadership. 

TTR: What are the main conclusions to be drawn on M&A activity in 2022? And in 1Q2023?  What are the most relevant drivers for consolidation of the M&A market in Spain for the rest of the year?

2022 was a very interesting year in the Spanish market, with high activity across different sectors, (telecoms, energy, renewables, real estate, health, etc) and high volume, although in the first semester the activity was higher.  Some of the reasons underlying the intense M&A activity in 2021 and 2022 remain present, although new uncertainties have arisen (high interest rates, inflation, etc), curbing M&A activity which fundamentally hinges on the confidence of the different market players.  As confidence returns and bidders and sellers re-adjust, we believe the M&A market will recover.  Some of our clients expect a strong recovery in activity levels in the second semester of 2023 while others think this will happen in 2024.

TTR: How would you describe the current situation of the M&A market players in Spain with the current global political and economic situation in this 1Q23?

In general, we are seeing a lower level of transactional activity. Potential bidders face more difficulties accessing financing, larger financing costs and even greater regulatory scrutiny (in particular, as regards antitrust and foreign investment regulation in the various jurisdictions). This has an impact on transactions, in part because it becomes harder to price assets and there is increased uncertainty as to the timeline of transactions.  That said, we believe that there continues to be interest in quality assets and that quality of advice and international experience in executing transactions will be key to the success of transactions.  

TTR: In terms of global prospects, do you think what happened with Silicon Valley Bank will affect the European market? What are the main lessons for players in this market?

We believe it will. In fact, we believe that it’s already having an effect as M&A activity is based on confidence among the main players and this has been affected by recent events in the financial markets.  Having said that, according to top experts in the field, the situation of the European financial sector is very solid.

Spanish version

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer España

Armando Albarrán

Dirige el grupo de Global Transactions (que incluye los grupos de M&A, Mercados de Capitales, Financiación e Inmobiliario) en España. Socio desde 2004, Armando está especializado en operaciones complejas con un elemento internacional, teles como: (i) MásMóvil en la fusión de MasMóvil/Orange España (19.600€ millones); (ii) Siemens Energy en su OPA sobre Siemens Gamesa (4.000€ millones); (iii) KKR en la compra de IVI-RMA (3.000€ millones) y la combinación con el grupo GeneraLife (adquirido por KKR en 2022, donde Freshfields también asesoró); y (iv) Merlin Properties en la venta de Tree Inversiones Inmobiliarias a BBVA (2.000€ millones), todas ellas las operaciones más grandes por sector, anunciadas en España en 2022.  Armando encabeza la clasificación anual de los abogados ‘Top 10 en España en M&A’ elaborada por la plataforma independiente TTR Data, de referencia en el mercado legal ibérico, donde se le acredita como asesor en operaciones de M&A por un valor total de 27.675€ millones, y superando al segundo clasificado en la tabla, por más de 8.000€ millones. Armando ha asesorado igualmente a emisores y aseguradores en numerosas salidas a Bolsa. También es muy activo en emisiones de bonos representando a clientes como Naturgy, Repsol, MERLIN o Amadeus.  Armando es licenciado en Derecho y Ciencias Empresariales por ICADE E-3.

TTR: Freshfields es el líder indiscutible en M&A en 2022, tal y como evidencia su alta cuota de mercado liderando el asesoramiento en las operaciones más grandes, complejas y sofisticadas, anunciadas en España el año pasado ¿Cuáles serán los principales desafíos de Freshfields en los próximos meses?

El ejercicio 2022 ha sido histórico para nuestra oficina de Madrid.  Como siempre nuestro objetivo para el 2023 es continuar estando próximos a nuestros clientes y acompañarles en sus operaciones.  Las incertidumbres políticas, económicas y regulatorias a las que estos se enfrentan hacen que, en estos momentos, el asesoramiento jurídico de calidad y la experiencia práctica sobre el terreno cobren una enorme importancia.  En este entorno de incertidumbre pensamos que la consistencia y calidad de nuestra red de oficinas, que es la red líder en Europa (en términos de calidad y cobertura de los principales mercados) y una de las principales a nivel global, representa una gran oportunidad para nosotros.  Mantener ese liderazgo es nuestro principal desafío para el 2023.

TTR: En su opinión ¿cuáles son las principales conclusiones para el mercado de M&A en 2022? ¿Y en el primer trimestre del año? ¿Cuáles son los drivers más relevantes para consolidar el mercado de M&A en España en lo que queda de año?

El año 2022 ha sido un ejercicio muy interesante en el mercado español, con mucha actividad en diversos sectores (telecomunicaciones, energía, renovables, inmobiliario, salud, etc…) y mucho volumen, si bien en la primera parte hubo mayor actividad.  Algunas de las razones que motivaron la intensa actividad de M&A en 2021 y 2022 continúan presentes aunque han surgido nuevas incertidumbres (alza de tipos, inflación, etc…) que dificultan la actividad de M&A que, en el fondo, se asienta en la confianza de los diferentes actores del mercado.  A medida que se recobre esa confianza y se ajusten las expectativas de compradores y vendedores pensamos que se recuperará el mercado de M&A.  Algunos de nuestros clientes esperan una fuerte recuperación de los niveles de actividad en la segunda mitad del año aunque otros sitúan esa reactivación en el ejercicio 2024.

TTR: ¿Cómo describiría la situación actual de los players del mercado de M&A en España, en las actuales circunstancias globales políticas y económicas, en este primer trimestre de 2023?

En general se observa un menor nivel de actividad transaccional.  Los potenciales compradores se enfrentan a mayores dificultades en el acceso a financiación, a mayores costes de financiación e incluso a un mayor escrutinio regulatorio (en particular en cuanto a la normativa de competencia e inversiones extranjeras en las diferentes jurisdicciones) y ello afecta a las operaciones, entre otras razones porque hay mayores dificultades para la fijación del precio de los activos y mayores incertidumbres en cuanto al calendario de las operaciones.  Dicho esto, creemos que sigue habiendo interés en los activos de calidad y que la calidad y la experiencia internacional en la ejecución de las operaciones serán factores relevantes en el éxito de las operaciones.

TTR: En términos de perspectivas globales, ¿cree que lo que sucedido con el Silicon Valley Bank puede afectar al mercado en Europa? ¿Cuáles son las principales lecciones para los players en este mercado? 

Creemos que sÍ.  De hecho creemos que ya está afectando porque la actividad de M&A se basa en la confianza de los principales actores y ésta se ha visto afectada por los recientes sucesos en el mundo financiero.  Dicho esto, en opinión de los mayores expertos en la materia, la situación del sector financiero en Europa es muy sólida.