Dealmaker Q&A

TTR Data Dealmaker Q&A con Carolina Albuerne, socia de Uría Menéndez

Uría Menéndez

Carolina Albuerne

Carolina Albuerne se incorporó a Uría Menéndez en septiembre de 2005. Es abogada del equipo de Corporate-M&A de la oficina de Madrid, ha estado desplazada en las oficinas de Barcelona y Nueva York y es socia de la firma desde 2022. Carolina ha adquirido una amplia experiencia en el ámbito societario, M&A, mercado de valores así como en el área regulatorio bancario. Nombrada mejor abogada de España menor de 40 años por Forbes en 2019, en 2020 la reconocida publicación británica Global Banking Regulation Review (GBRR) nombró a Carolina una de las 45 mejores abogadas del mundo en regulación bancaria menores de 45 años. Carolina Albuerne asesora en grandes operaciones de fusiones y adquisiciones y en reorganizaciones y reestructuraciones corporativas transfronterizas y nacionales en las que participan bancos españoles.

Carolina también asesora en operaciones que implican deuda híbrida y otros instrumentos de capital cualificados según la normativa bancaria, así como en el diseño de estructuras de capital eficientes desde una perspectiva regulatoria. Proporciona también asesoramiento jurídico de forma recurrente a los bancos en materia de gobierno corporativo y en la aplicación de la normativa de resolución.


¿Cuáles son las tendencias más destacadas que están moldeando el mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en España y Europa en 2025? ¿Cómo crees que estas tendencias influirán en la estrategia de las firmas legales en los próximos años?

Las tensiones geopolíticas y, más recientemente, las comerciales están marcando la agenda. El anuncio de tarifas de Estados Unidos está teniendo un efecto devastador en la confianza del mercado. En este contexto, la reacción de muchos inversores a la incertidumbre es la habitual: protegerse y wait and see, y eso se ve en el menor apetito inversor.

El marco global favorece —al menos parcialmente— los procesos de renacionalización de las cadenas de producción y suministro. Quizás también con un menor énfasis global en la descarbonización. Es difícil que la Unión Europea pueda ser ajena a estas macrotendencias.

Una solución rápida y satisfactoria de la crisis tarifaria sería muy positiva para la confianza del mercado en Europa. Si se logra, los grandes programas de inversión pública europeos, especialmente el de Alemania, puede tener efectos muy positivos en ciertas industrias, como la de defensa o la de telecomunicaciones.

Para el sector bancario quizás la perspectiva sea más mixta. Por un lado, los mayores programas de inversión pública y las mayores tarifas comerciales pueden tener efectos inflacionarios a medio plazo, pero a corto plazo la volatilidad del mercado podría obligar a los bancos centrales a moderar o bajar los tipos de interés.

¿Qué sectores económicos están mostrando mayor dinamismo y oportunidades en términos de operaciones de M&A en España? ¿Qué factores están impulsando este crecimiento en dichos sectores?

Como apuntaba, quizás los sectores relacionados con defensa, telecomunicaciones, minería y sector financiero son aquellos con un entorno previsiblemente más favorable; pero todo puede cambiar rápidamente.

¿Qué impacto podría tener la actividad del mercado transaccional en el sector bancario en España y en la consolidación del mercado financiero europeo?

Los programas de gasto público ligados a la defensa podrían previsiblemente tener un efecto inflacionario que provoque un entorno con tipos de interés más elevados de los esperados hace unos meses.

Y esto sería positivo para el sector financiero, y en particular para el bancario. En ese entorno, cabría esperar en la Unión Europea nuevos procesos de M&A, buscando mayores economías de escala, en un entorno donde la mayor parte de los bancos europeos están fuertemente capitalizados, con baja morosidad y, por fin, con una elevada rentabilidad.

Sin embargo, no es menos cierto que la enorme volatilidad del mercado en los últimos días puede incrementar la mentalidad defensiva en el sector bancario y provocar un nuevo retraso en estos procesos de consolidación.

Las perspectivas para 2025 y para 2026 podrá depender, además del componente macro (que no es menor), de la evolución de los procesos de concentración bancaria que actualmente protagonizan las entidades italianas, y en particular Unicredit. Habrá que ver si tiene éxito en su operación con Commerzbank, porque se trataría de la primera integración bancaria transfronteriza en muchos años, un verdadero breakthrough. No es un secreto que las instituciones comunitarias, como la Comisión Europea o el Banco Central Europeo, están muy interesadas en los procesos de concentración transfronterizos en la Unión para crear entidades con escala para competir globalmente con las entidades americanas o chinas.

Creo también que la posible desaparición de la incertidumbre regulatoria puede ayudar a dar mayor claridad a los inversores bancarios. Y parece que la música ha cambiado por primera vez en casi veinte años: por primera vez se habla seriamente de desregulación. Esto puede actuar como un incentivo adicional para el M&A en este sector.

Considerando tu participación en grandes operaciones internacionales, ¿cuáles son los principales desafíos que enfrentan las firmas legales al asesorar en transacciones transfronterizas? ¿Cómo se pueden superar estos obstáculos para garantizar el éxito de las operaciones?

Lo primero es que para un buen delivery en estas operaciones no se necesita tener una oficina en cada país. De hecho, una de las cosas que nos da más flexibilidad, y que en despachos como Uría Menéndez podemos hacer, es elegir —para cada jurisdicción— los despachos que queremos tener en nuestro equipo para cada operación, típicamente nuestra red de best friends, despachos de elite en los principales países europeos.

Pero tenemos muchas otras opciones en el caso, por ejemplo, de que estén conflictuados o por la razón que sea consideremos que otro asesor encaja mejor en una determinada operación. Además de buenos abogados locales en los que confíes, necesitas flexibilidad, experiencia y, por encima de todo, la capacidad para coordinar grandes equipos en múltiples geografías, a veces en husos horarios distintos. Y esto último (la coordinación para que el trabajo sea homogéneo y acorde a nuestro estándar) es, en mi opinión, lo más complicado, pero donde se marca la diferencia para el cliente.

Desde 2021, has sido reconocida como una de las principales asesoras legales en el mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en España. Mirando hacia atrás en tu trayectoria, ¿Qué factores consideras que han sido clave para tu crecimiento y reconocimiento en un sector tradicionalmente dominado por perfiles jurídicos masculinos?

Es difícil resumirlo. En mi caso, si tuviera que destacar algunos factores clave, serían la perseverancia y la fiabilidad. Tener una base sólida de conocimientos jurídicos se da por sentado en una firma como la nuestra. Pero lo que marca la diferencia es estar siempre preparada, dar lo mejor de una misma y dejarse la piel por los clientes y por los compañeros. Creo que eso ha sido determinante para ganarme su confianza y para que me involucraran en operaciones relevantes.

A lo largo de los años, no todo ha salido siempre como esperaba, pero cuando tienes claras tus prioridades, es más fácil mantener el rumbo y seguir trabajando con determinación.

En relación con la diversidad, en Uría Menéndez nunca me han hecho sentir “de menos” —tampoco “de más”— por ser mujer. Mi recomendación para cualquier mujer que se plantee una carrera en un despacho es trabajar duro, y los resultados llegarán

Con la evolución constante del entorno económico y regulatorio, ¿qué cambios anticipas en el mercado de fusiones y adquisiciones en el corto y mediano plazo? ¿Cómo deberían prepararse las firmas legales para adaptarse a estos cambios?

Por ahora, no se vislumbran grandes cambios, aparte de los potenciales sectores que pueden ser más protagonistas en el M&A. Todo parece indicar que el private equity seguirá siendo el protagonista de las operaciones de inversión y desinversión, pero habrá que estar a la incierta evolución del mercado.

Previsiblemente, a medida en que se avance en la integración del mercado común, veremos más y más operaciones transfronterizas, así que el perfil de abogado con capacidad de liderar operaciones internacionales es clave. Tampoco se puede ignorar el papel de la inteligencia artificial en el sector legal, con capacidad para automatizar las tareas más rutinarias y de menor valor añadido. Pero no olvidemos una cosa, un buen abogado tiene que ser por encima de todo un asesor de la operación, alguien en quien el cliente confíe. Nuestro rol nunca debe ser el de un mero redactor de contratos.

Por eso, para nosotros, es fundamental seguir invirtiendo en nuestro principal activo, nuestros abogados. En los tiempos que corren, no hay excusas para que un buen abogado no solo tenga que saber de derecho, hablar idiomas y vivir cómodamente en la tecnología; tiene que tener capacidades comerciales y el conocimiento del mercado para ganarse la confianza de sus clientes

Relatório Mensal Portugal – Novembro 2019

Mercado português regista 346 Fusões e Aquisições até novembro, alta de 8,4%

No período de janeiro a novembro o mercado transacional português acumula 346 transações, alta de 8,46% em relação ao mesmo período do ano anterior, e caminha para fechar 2019 com números muito próximos ao de 2018, que terminou com 367 negócios mapeados. No período, 130 transações tiveram seus valores divulgados que somaram 8,4 bilhões de euros, o que representa uma redução de 7% ante ao período homólogo de 2018, de acordo com o mais recente Relatório de M&A do TTR -Transactional Track Record

Somente no mês de novembro foram mapeadas pelo TTR – Transactional Track Record  21 transações e um valor total de 143,89 milhões de euros, frente as 26 registadas em novembro de 2018.

O sector Imobiliário apesar de apresentar ligeira retração, 2%, manteve a posição de mais ativo no período, com 79 transações registadas. Tecnologia em segundo com 52 operações, alta de 27% e Financeiro aparece em terceiro com 38 deals, alta de 15%

No âmbito das operações cross-border inbound, em que empresas estrangeiras investiram em companhias baseadas em Portugal, foram registadas 158 transações. As empresas espanholas seguem como as mais ativas, com 42 aquisições no período, e especial preferência pelo sector Imobiliário. Em segunda posição estão as empresas dos Estados Unidos com 27 transações, o que representa um aumento de 35% em relação ao mesmo período do ano anterior.

Venture Capital

Os investimentos realizados por fundos de Venture Capital registou alta de 67,5% no número de operações, 67, além de registar alta de 51,7% no valor total investido que alcançou 348 milhões de euros.

No número total de investimentos predominam os de âmbito cross-border, 37 negócios, onde fundos estrangeiros realizam investimentos em empresas portuguesas.

As empresas que atuam no segmento de Tecnologia foram as que mais receberam  investimentos com um total de 34 operações, o que representa uma alta de 70%. A Portugal Ventures é a mais ativa com 18 investimentos.

Private Equity

Os investimentos realizados por fundos de Private Equity somaram 33 negócios até novembro, o que representa redução de 15,38% se comparado ao mesmo período de 2018. Em relação aos valores investidos apenas oito destes negócios tiveram valores divulgados que somaram 1,59 bilhões de euros.

Dealmakers

Do ponto de vista dos Dealmakers, termo utilizado pelo TTR para demoninar os profissionais de assessoria, que são atores importantes na dinâminca do mercado de fusões e aquisições português, o relatório traz um completo ranking de assessoria jurídica em transações de Fusões e Aquisições em lei portuguesa, tendo em conta transações que se iniciaram em 2019.

DealMaker Q&A

TTR DealMaker Q&A with Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez Abogados Associate Alan García

Deal Summary:

On 30 November 2018, Lima-based asset management firm Sigma SAFI acquired a 51% interest in the Parque Eólico Marcona and Parque Eólico Tres Hermanas from Grupo Cobra for USD 56m, consolidating its ownership of Peru’s largest wind farms with a combined installed capacity of 130MW between them. The wind farms were developed by Grupo Cobra, a Spain-based subsidiary of ACS, with financing provided by a consortium of institutions including Eximbank, KFW DEG, FMO, CAF, Proparco and Natixis.TTR DealMaker Q&A with Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez Abogados Associate Alan García

Alan García

Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez Abogados Associate Alan García discusses details of a complex transaction that saw Sigma SAFI consolidate its ownership of Peru’s largest wind farm assets by paying off legacy creditors in the country’s first ever co-issuance.

TTR: How long have you been working with Sigma SAFI and how did you land this mandate?

AG: We’ve had a relationship with Sigma SAFI that spans several years. We represented the fund manager in 2015 and 2016 when it acquired its initial 49% interest in the two wind farms when Grupo Cobra retained its 51% stake. A couple of months ago we carried out a restructuring of the debt held by each entity, and from there we executed the acquisition. It was logical that we could be of value to the buyer given our understanding of the refinancing arrangement, which was a precursor to the acquisition. There were eight financial entities involved with mirrored contracts for Tres Hermanas and Marcona, each with its own project finance with all the associated step-in rights.

TTR: What made this transaction so complicated?

AG: The deal was complex because it required prepaying debt held by international development banks and simultaneously carrying out a private placement, all on the heels of a refinancing. Each project company had to be handled independently with their respective assets and concession agreements used as guarantees to the creditors. The complexities of the deal relate to its structure of guarantees that couldn’t be shared between entities and the symmetrical contracts that were drafted under New York and Peruvian Laws. The sequence of execution of the various contracts required to carry out the deal within a short period given to eliminate prior liens made the transaction especially challenging.

TTR: What makes this deal unique?

AG: This was the first co-issuance of notes by Peruvian issuers in Peru’s history. Being a replacement of debt and guarantees, basically with one project finance substituted by another, makes this deal stand out, especially given that between them the two wind farms represent 60% of the wind power capacity in Peru.

TTR: Which practice areas were involved?

AG: We had two teams working simultaneously, one dedicated to the acquisition and the other to the refinancing. Both teams were led by Finance and Capital Markets Partner Eduardo Vega and me, with parallel negotiations. We had corporate, tax, regulatory and energy specialists in each with a total of eight attorneys.

TTR Dealmaker Q&A with Felipe Creazzo – K&L Gates

Felipe Creazzo

Partner at
K&L Gates


Arvato Bertelsmann takes controlling stake in Intervalor

On 29 March, Guetersloh, Germany-based Arvato Bertelsmann increased its equity interest in São Paulo-based credit collections firm Intervalor to 81.5% following its initial 40% acquisition in June 2015. K&L Gates Partner Felipe Creazzo led the international legal team advising the buyer after having advised in the prior transaction.

Q: How did K&L Gates land the mandate to advise Arvato Bertelsmann?

A: I advised it on its initial 40% stake acquisition in 2015. It was a natural choice for the client to rely again on me at K&L Gates for the follow-on deal in view of my experience with the structure, with several of the commercial and business aspects related to the acquisition and with internal policies that needed to be reflected on the transaction documents. These aspects streamlined the transaction and made it more cost efficient. Needless to say, a local firm was needed to carry out local due diligence and make sure all the commercial aspects were properly reflected on the documents and complied with local law. Lobo & de Rizzo, the firm I was previously a partner with, which was involved in the first deal, was the appropriate choice. While I’ve left Lobo & de Rizzo Advogados, I have good friends there, very fine and seasoned M&A lawyers among them, and look forward to other opportunities to work together.

Q: How did the fact that you’d worked with this client shape your approach in this most recent transaction?

A: Although my Brazilian admission is properly suspended with the Brazilian Bar as I practice foreign law only, the client greatly benefited from my broader perspective of the transaction as a dual-admitted lawyer. My coordination of the local firm’s involvement ensured that all local law compliance was in place on an optimized and cost efficient manner. Since I’ve been on both sides, I can work with local firms effectively and also become a direct channel of information to the client with respect to many of the local law aspects that would normally take time to be digested. In an international capacity, it’s easier for me to reflect the clients’ business needs into the agreement.

Q: To what extent did Brazil’s current recession play a role in the timing of this deal?

A: Intervalor is a financial services provider in Brazil and one of its core activities is collection services. It’s an active moment for that type of industry in Brazil. Also, there’s a part of the business that includes the promotion of credit products that can be expected to recover significantly in the near future. This transaction was not based on a short-term perspective for Arvato Bertelsmann. It was generally a good moment to invest and to benefit from both still low prices and a more beneficial currency exchange rate.

Q: To what extent is the follow-on deal a reflection of achieving pre-established benchmarks?

A: The follow-on acquisition was the result of convenience and negotiation, but there were in fact opportunities for changing shareholding percentages that could materialize sooner or later based on the terms of the prior agreement. For this deal, it all came together as a result of friendly conversations among the shareholders. Everyone was happy with the progress made since the initial entry, and there was a lot of synergy and systems were being successfully integrated. There’s already a new face to the company. Becoming part of an international group is going to be beneficial to every stakeholder, from management to employees to shareholders. There’s an enormous positive vibration to this deal.

Q: Why was Intervalor the right stepping-stone into Latin America?

A: Brazil is not for the weak of heart, it’s a tough market to crack. Doing business here, by far the largest economy in Latin America, provides any foreign investor with useful tools not only to do business here, but also to succeed in other Latin American markets. It doesn’t necessarily mean that if something works here it will work in Chile or Argentina, but it does help starting with Brazil. The size of the market here in Brazil, as compared to other Latin American markets, was also an important factor.

Q: What made this deal stand out among other M&A transactions you’ve advised on?

A: It was a particularly complex deal. In terms of legal documentation, there was a prior acquisition arrangement in effect that had to subsist. Matching this new acquisition in 2017 with the previous one was hard work from a legal perspective, in every aspect of the transaction documents.

TTR Dealmaker Q&A – Moacir Zilbovicius

TTR Dealmaker Q&A

September 2016

Kroton Educacional acquires Estácio Participações

USD 1.63bn

Moacir Zilbovicius
Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Advogados

On 16 August 2016 Estácio Participações accepted Kroton Educacional’s USD 1.63bn takeover bid. Moacir Zilbovicius was part of the legal team at Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Advogados that advised the seller in this monumental transaction.


Q: How did Mattos Filho land the advisory mandate and when was the firm retained?

A: We were engaged in the first week of June thanks to our relationship with Estácio’s board members and owing also to referrals from financial institutions involved in the deal.

Q: What prompted your client to explore strategic alternatives?

A: Both Kroton’s and Grupo Ser´s offers were unsolicited. As far as I know, Estácio was not pursuing strategic alternatives at the time. What ensued after Kroton’s offer was made public was basically the board members assessing the offer and pursuing the best alternative available for its shareholders.

Q: Beyond the economic factor, what made Kroton’s bid more enticing than Grupo Ser’s previous offer?

A: Several factors came into play, but, beyond the economic and strategic factors, one that played an important role was management´s assessment of the likelihood of shareholders from both companies approving the deal. 

Q: How does this transaction impact Brazil’s higher education landscape?

A: Both the Brazilian antitrust authorities and Ministry of Education are assessing the impacts of this deal, if any, and should issue their views on this, hopefully, sooner than later.

Q: What practice areas were critical in the deal and in what way did the transaction require Mattos Filho to employ its unique capabilities?

A: I am proud to say that Mattos Filho was involved in almost all of the recent merger transactions involving public companies in Brazil. This gives us not only a competitive edge, but also relevant know-how and expertise in handling such complex transactions. We have also actively participated in numerous deals involving corporations with no controlling shareholder or group, which enabled us to provide Estácio’s management with the specific guidance it needed to handle the unique situation it found itself in. Obviously, addressing the antitrust circumstances involved in the transaction was also highly important. We have a highly specialized antitrust group that allowed us to live up to the task at hand.

Q: What antitrust hurdles does the transaction face?

A: Though the deal was approved in the general shareholders meetings of both companies, it remains subject to the approval of the Brazilian antitrust authorities and Ministry of Education. The businesses of Kroton and Estácio are very complementary, in particular from a geographic standpoint, and the parties are confident that the necessary antitrust approval will be obtained in due course. 

Q: What distinguished this transaction from other M&A deals Mattos Filho has advised on?

A: The fact that it involved two companies with no controlling shareholder or group of shareholders, and that it was prompted by an unsolicited offer that led to competing offers from the market, and almost the launching of a tender offer by a relevant shareholder and member of the target´s board, made the deal very unique.

Q: How is the legal advisory work different in such a transaction where there is no controlling shareholder? 

A: Our work was mainly focused on advising the board of directors and the special committee that was created specifically to negotiate the transaction with Kroton.

See-Full-Transactions-Details

Download PDF